Benghazi Coverup – Not Ready For Prime Time

There are about 15,000 murders in the United States each year and most go unnoticed and unreported.  A tiny handful captures the attention of the public as did the trial of Jodi Arias.  Why is that?

Humans are drawn to a freak show and this woman clearly fits that bill.  But is that all?  I don’t think so.  I think the media picks and chooses this sort of thing.  After all, they are subject to ratings like anything else on TV and this case had all the elements of a primetime drama.  Essentially, the media chooses for us and directs our attention to what they think we ought to care about.

Yesterday, as the whistleblowers were testifying before Congress about the Benghazi cover-up, the news came out that the jury had reached their verdict in Arias’ murder trial.  I am certain that there was a collective sigh of relief in newsrooms across the country, and fist-bumps all around.  Here was a bright, shiny object for the media to hold up and say, “Look!  Over here!  Never mind that congressional investigation.  The verdict is in on the crazy woman. This is what you need to know.  This is what you ought to be paying attention to.”

And so the news across the nation is set.  Jodi Arias’ fate takes the headlines.  The story of the Benghazi cover-up is relegated to the politics section and presented as partisan bickering about an incident that “happened a long time ago.”   As Whitehouse spokesman, Jay Carney, continues to lie even yesterday about the talking points, the media is telling us to move along.  There’s nothing to see here.

For those of us who have been watching this since the beginning, who have been waiting for the truth to be exposed, this is all bittersweet.  The media is setting the template and how this all ends has already been written.

It’s crystal clear now that President Obama, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Ambassador Susan Rice and their support staffs have been lying to us since 9/11/12.  The narrative that, under President Obama, terrorism had been defeated had to be protected to ensure his reelection just weeks later.

And four Americans, in service of the nation, died horrible, violent deaths because of it.

Those who step forward to tell the truth will pay a heavy price.  Years of service to their country will be wiped away as they are threatened and demoted to paper-pushers.  Make no mistake that this is a warning to anyone else thinking about speaking up.

Jodi Arias will pay for her crime with her life, whether she’s executed or spends the rest of her days in prison.

But who will pay for the deaths of Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Ty Woods?

Some observers are saying that this is President Obama’s Watergate.  But the key element in President Nixon’s fall was a relentless press that kept his missteps in the news day after day, week after week.  The press wanted to take Nixon out.

This is not the case with the media today and their relationship with President Obama.  Actually, that relationship is the exact opposite of the one with Nixon.  The members of our media today are firm supporters of this president and have already demonstrated that they will protect him at any cost.  They will promote any lie, ignore any shortcoming and attack any adversary.  They may allow some flunky, some low-level staffer to take heat for stepping outside the lines, but the president and members of his administration are safely in their embrace.

This is how it works now.  Too many Americans have abdicated their duty to keep themselves informed and rely on a corrupt media to tell them what to think.  The media is free to call the shots when the public simply follows that bright, shiny object.

And so, while the public is distracted and wondering who will win American Idol and what fate awaits Jodi Arias, our government has a free rein to do as they please, secure that they will never be held to account.  If you’re looking for any kind of justice and hoping that your elected leaders will have to answer for what they’ve done, you are going to be disappointed.

The ending has already been written in the newsrooms of America.

-Kathy

Read Full Post »

Benghazi Whistleblowers To Testify

From The Blaze:

Ambassador Christopher Stevens’ former deputy Gregory Hicks is contradicting the Obama administration’s narrative as to why no help arrived in Benghazi in time to prevent the deaths of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans, according to a CBS News report.

The administration has repeatedly said no assistance could have made it to Benghazi in time to prevent the deaths, and that all available resources were utilized throughout the roughly eight-hour attack.

But Hicks has reportedly told congressional investigators that a Special Forces team was ready to fly in from Tripoli, but that U.S. Special Operations Command South Africa forbade them from going.

CBS News’ Sharyl Attkisson has the story:

According to excerpts released Monday, Hicks told investigators that SOCAFRICA commander Lt. Col. Gibson and his team were on their way to board a C-130 from Tripoli for Benghazi prior to an attack on a second U.S. compound “when [Col. Gibson] got a phone call from SOCAFRICA which said, ‘you can’t go now, you don’t have the authority to go now.’ And so they missed the flight … They were told not to board the flight, so they missed it.”

Hicks told congressional investigators that if the U.S. had quickly sent a military aircraft over Benghazi, it might have saved American lives. The U.S. Souda Bay Naval Base is an hour’s flight from Libya.

“I believe if we had been able to scramble a fighter or aircraft or two over Benghazi as quickly as possible after the attack commenced, I believe there would not have been a mortar attack on the annex in the morning because I believe the Libyans would have split. They would have been scared to death that we would have gotten a laser on them and killed them,” Hicks testified. Two Americans died in the morning mortar attack.  [Emphasis added]

Hicks became the highest-ranking American diplomat in Libya after Stevens’ death, and was in Tripoli at the time of the attack.

Hicks said Stevens called him at the onset of the attack shouting: “We’re under attack! We’re under attack!”  Hicks immediately called Washington and, according to excerpts of his testimony, said he was “in communications with Washington all night long…reporting all night long what was happening to Washington by telephone.”

“I never reported a demonstration; I reported an attack on the consulate,” he said in excerpts released on CBS over the weekend, also contradicting the administration’s original narrative that the attack was the outgrowth of a protest related to a YouTube video.

“Chris — Chris’s last report, if you want to say his final report, is, ‘Greg, we are under attack.’”

Hicks is scheduled to speak publicly for the first time before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday.

Tomorrow we’ll finally hear from a few of the people involved who want to tell the truth about what happened in Benghazi 8 months ago.

I doubt we’ll ever learn where our president was during the hours and hours that Americans were under fire.  The same for our Secretary of State.  No effort will be spared to protect them, especially by their devoted media members.  Any attempt to hold them responsible for what they’ve done, or more accurately, what they failed to do will be met with cries of politics as usual, racism, misogyny and right-wing hysteria.

I don’t know if they or the others involved in this massive failure and cover-up will every pay any price.  But we will learn the truth and it will probably be very close to what so many of us have thought it was all along.

That truth includes the death of four Americans as the cost of winning an election.

-Kathy

Read Full Post »

Still Not Connecting The Dots

After the attacks of 9/11/01 we learned that our intelligence agencies were not talking to each other.  The now famous “wall” that prevented them from sharing information was exposed.  It was suggested that had they been sharing their intelligence, we would have “connected the dots” and the outcome that day may have been different.

In response, we set up the Department of Homeland Security.  This new Cabinet department was to protect us and to be a kind of clearing house.  Agencies would report the information they gathered and combined with the work of other agencies, we would be better able to detect and foil plots against America.

The dots would now be connected.

As information about the terrorist attack in Boston drips out, we’re learning that things haven’t gone as promised.  We now know that the Russians warned both our FBI and CIA that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was a dangerous guy and we should keep an eye on him.

The FBI says they investigated Tamerlan, found nothing suspicious and closed their investigation.  He was not an American citizen, but they claim it was against the law to watch him any longer.  A couple of months later Tamerlan took a six-month “vacation” to beautiful Dagestan.

Mmm, the next time I have a six-month vacation that’s where I’m headed.  Keep the Margheritas coming.

Dagaestan is a hotbed of Muslim extremism.  One would think that if this man who had already been under suspicion returned to the US after such a visit, that someone would notice.  But the FBI said last week that they were unaware of his return as his name had been misspelled on this paperwork.

He’s not even a US citizen.  How does he get back in the country with paperwork that is misspelled?

It gets worse.  A couple of days later, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano says we did know he had travelled to Dagestan.  She said we got a “ping” upon his return.  It turns out a customs agent noticed him, but who this information was shared with is a mystery as I write this.  Clearly, it was not the FBI.

The FBI also claims to have been left in the dark with regard to Tamerlan’s little brother and fellow terrorist, Dzhokhar.  Dzhokhar is in custody and the FBI had been questioning him prior to Miranda under the Public Safety Exemption.  They say he was singing like a canary.

But 16 hours into the 48 hours of questioning allowable under the law, a judge and a US attorney showed up at the hospital to read Dzhokhar his rights.

The FBI claims they were surprised and weren’t finished with their questions.  The DOJ says they told the FBI that they were coming.

And throughout it all, Boston’s Regional Intelligence Center says no one ever told them anything at all.

These are just a few of the things we’ve learned (and that I can recall off the top of my head.)  Who knows what else has gone wrong that we haven’t yet heard about, and may never hear about.

But one thing seems clear.  Could we all now please agree that the DHS is a massive failure?

We have spent hundreds of billions of dollars on an agency with hundreds of thousands of employees and what have we got to show for it?

While high school dropouts with felony records and TSA badges are assaulting little boys and grandmas at our airports, terrorists are living in our cites and planning their attacks in the kitchens of their Section 8 houses.

The only dots being connected are ones that show Americans who thought they were getting security have been throwing their tax dollars down a federal toilet for a secretive agency that deprives law-abiding citizens of their constitutional rights while Islamic jihadists on the government teat plot right under their noses to kill Americans and blow their legs off.

-Kathy

Read Full Post »

Terrorists’ Rights

From the Boston Herald:

The (Deval) Patrick administration clamped down the lid yesterday on Herald requests for details of Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s government benefits, citing the dead terror mastermind’s right to privacy.

Across the board, state agencies flatly refused to provide information about the taxpayer-funded lifestyle for the 26-year-old man and his brother and accused accomplice Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19.

On EBT card status or spending, state welfare spokesman Alec Loftus would only say Tamerlan Tsarnaev, his wife and 3-year-old daughter received benefits that ended in 2012. He declined further comment.

On unemployment compensation, labor department spokesman Kevin Franck refused to say whether Tamerlan Tsarnaev ever collected, saying it was “confidential and not a matter of public record.”

On Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s college aid, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth spokesman Robert Connolly said, “It is our position — and I believe the accepted position in higher education — that student records including academic records and financial records (including financial aid) cannot under federal law be released without a student’s consent.”

On cellphones, the Federal Communications Commission would not say whether either brother had a government-paid cellphone, also citing privacy laws.

On housing, Cambridge officials and the family’s landlord ducked questions on whether the brothers were ever on Section 8 assistance.

The Herald reported yesterday that Tamerlan Tsarnaev, his wife and 3-year-old daughter collected welfare until 2012 and that both Tamerlan and Dzhokhar received benefits through their parents “for a limited portion” of the time after they came to the U.S., which was around 2002.

However, the Department of Transitional Assistance wouldn’t release information about how long or how much they received.

It remains unclear how the accused bomber brothers financed their heartless attacks on the marathon.

The administration was slammed by a Democratic congressman who insisted the public has a right to know how taxpayers were underwriting the accused jihadist Tsarnaevs.

“It’s certainly relevant information that should be made public,” U.S. Rep. Stephen F. Lynch told the Herald. “There’s a national security interest No. 1. Secondly, there’s also a public interest in finding out whether these individuals were able to exploit the system and get benefits they weren’t entitled to.”

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev lies hospitalized and facing capital charges that include using a weapon of mass destruction that killed three people and injured 260 near the Boston Marathon finish line.

Taxpayers — already on the hook for Tsarnaev’s court-appointed attorneys in the terror plot — continue to pay his mounting medical bills at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

The public also paid for Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s attorney when the Russian national successfully fought criminal charges in 2009 that he battered a former girlfriend.

There was a time when newcomers to America were required to demonstrate the ability to support themselves before we let them in.

Now they can preach against us, hurl bombs, kill and maim our citizens and police, all while living off our generosity.

And we are asked to respect their “rights.”

-Kathy

Read Full Post »

Nanny Bloomberg Will Save Us

New York City’s Nanny Mayor, Mike Bloomberg, is famous for legislating human behavior and personal freedoms.  He believes he knows best what is good for the people of New York City , and that they are too stupid to properly care for themselves.  He regulates anything he can, even how much soda New Yorkers should drink.

He’s a progressive.  This is what progressives do.

Now Nanny Bloomberg says that because of the terrorist attack in Boston we’re going to have to change our “interpretation” of the Constitution.

Wow.

This is how very bad things start, folks.  Time to break out the history books and brush up.

“…we live in a complex word where you’re going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will. And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change,” says Nanny Bloomberg.

“It really says something bad about us that we have to do it. But our obligation first and foremost is to keep our kids safe in the schools; first and foremost, to keep you safe if you go to a sporting event; first and foremost is to keep you safe if you walk down the streets or go into our parks.  We cannot let the terrorists put us in a situation where we can’t do those things. And the ways to do that is to provide what we think is an appropriate level of protection.”

“Says something bad about us that we have to do it?”  Aww, shucks.  He really doesn’t want to do any of this but he has to.  What a guy.

It’s safe to say that Bloomberg isn’t planning to promote more gun ownership, so that we can protect ourselves and our families should we find ourselves in a situation like the people “sheltering in place” in Boston last week.

And I’m sure he won’t be asking for stricter enforcement of immigration rules and stronger FBI follow-up on people in our country on visas.

He certainly won’t be asking that we keep a closer eye on those preaching Jihad in the United States.  He wouldn’t dare.

No, none of these things are what he’s got in mind.

He’s talking about ways to limit freedom and take away more liberty from law-abiding Americans, in exchange for some false security.

He’s a progressive.  This is what progressives do.

Bloomberg’s official power only covers New York City.  But he has many friends in the world of progressive politicians.  And he has gobs-o-money to spend, as he has in the past, to launch misinformation campaigns to change the minds and hearts of low information voters.

Beware.  Bloomberg is not the only nanny who sees an opportunity here.  Recall how the victims of the murders at the Sandy Hook school were exploited to gain support for gun control.

Freedom grabbing politicians are already planning ways to use the terrorist attack in Boston to convince Americans to give away more of their rights.  And if they can’t convince enough people to support them, they will try to simply take liberty in the name of security.

After all, our security is first and foremost.  They don’t really want to do any of those things.  But they have to.

Really.

It’s for our own good, even if we’re too stupid to see that.

-Kathy

Read Full Post »

Funding Terrorists

We all get pretty annoyed when we hear about abuses to our welfare system.  We’re compassionate and benevolent and we know some people just need some help sometimes.  But we also know there are far too many people taking advantage of the system, and of us.

Well try this – the Boston terrorists were welfare recipients.

From The Boston Herald:

“Marathon bombings mastermind Tamerlan Tsarnaev was living on taxpayer-funded state welfare benefits even as he was delving deep into the world of radical anti-American Islamism, the Herald has learned.

 State officials confirmed last night that Tsarnaev, slain in a raging gun battle with police last Friday, was receiving benefits along with his wife, Katherine Russell Tsarnaev, and their 3-year-old daughter. The state’s Executive Office of Health and Human Services said those benefits ended in 2012 when the couple stopped meeting income eligibility limits. Russell Tsarnaev’s attorney has claimed Katherine — who had converted to Islam — was working up to 80 hours a week as a home health aide while Tsarnaev stayed at home.

 In addition, both of Tsarnaev’s parents received benefits, and accused brother bombers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan were recipients through their parents when they were younger, according to the state.”

Full article here.

Gee, I wonder if they used Obamaphones to detonate their bombs.

I’m tired.  I’m tired of hearing that angry, old, white males are the problem in America.  It’s angry, old, white males who contributed the most in taxes to support all this.  No wonder they’re angry.  I’m angry too.

Today, when you see the news that law-abiding, hard-working, tax-paying, peaceful American citizens are waiting in line for hours at our airports because our elected leaders have cut air traffic controllers because we can’t afford them, think of this.

When you hear our elected leaders talking about their latest bill to “fix our immigration problem” and bring another 20 million into the fold, think of this.  Ask yourself how they are going to monitor the movement and intentions of all those people when they missed these guys even after the Russians called us and warned us!  Think of how many of those 20 million will run straight to the welfare office.  I know, they told us they won’t be eligible for benefits.  Right.

The next time some pompous politician yells at those honest, hard-working, law-abiding American citizens that they, “don’t need 10 bullets to kill a deer!”  think of this.  Those Americans just might need far more than 10 bullets to protect themselves from jihadists living down the street – in a house supported by their tax dollars.

Our entire system is badly broken and this episode shines a bright light on how deep it goes.  People paid with their lives and their limbs.

And what does our government do in the face of all this and more?  Disarm Americans, welcome in known law-breakers by the millions and demand we give them more tax dollars.

For what?  To fund the next terrorist?

It’s high time we stopped worrying about political correctness, diversity and what passes for compassion these days, and started doing what’s good for honest, hard-working American citizens.

We’re pretty tired of being used as the world’s doormat.

-Kathy

Read Full Post »

Sheltering In Place

Last week we all watched as the areas near the terrorist attack in Boston changed from quiet, residential neighborhoods to war zones as law enforcement searched for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the surviving bomber.  The concerned reporters on our TVs told us residents were “sheltering in place.”

That doesn’t sound so bad, does it?

They told us police were conducting a door to door search for the suspect.  What they didn’t tell us was that the Fourth Amendment had been suspended and law-abiding Americans were finding themselves on the wrong end of the weapons of a small army.

One could make the argument that law enforcement cannot know what’s behind any door. They must act accordingly.  And this certainly was an unusual event.

What I see is law-abiding American citizens paying the price again for the shortcomings of our federal government.  Once again, the consequences of bad policy and mistakes are not paid by those who set that policy or make the mistakes, but by those of us who put our trust in them.

-Kathy

Read Full Post »

I’m Really Angry Today

I’m really angry this morning.  I’m watching the unfolding events in Boston as you are probably doing too.  And I’m angry.

Our elected leaders are currently focused on immigration and their main concern is the plight of poor Mexicans.  Meanwhile foreign terrorists are living among us, waiting to make their move.

Our government officials are focused on the Romeike family, here from Germany – Christians who just want to home-school their children.

Religious asylum (for Christians) doesn’t seem to count much anymore, even though it’s the reason our early settlers came here.  Our government chooses to focus on this family, and fight in court to deport them.

But foreign terrorists live among us.  Don’t fool yourself into thinking these two guys in Boston are an aberration, or that they are alone.

Who’s watching them?   Who wants to deport them?

We gave one of them a scholarship and sent him to our finest schools.  Look how he repaid us.

Our national devotion to “diversity” (as long as it’s not Christian) invites our own destruction.

When are we going to learn that evil is real, it exists and you can’t be nice enough to it to change it?  It has to be defeated.

And for Heaven’s sake – could we protect ourselves from it, rather than inviting it in?

Diversity is NOT what makes us great.  It is a subject of worship for our progressive leaders and this has to change.  Welcoming in evil in the name of diversity just killed three people, including a child and blew the legs off all those others still fighting to survive.

When are we going to learn?  What’s it going to take?

-Kathy

Read Full Post »

Live The Life You Have Today

Some random thoughts about the attack yesterday:

Live the life you have today.  Stop waiting for the one you wish you had.

The bombing in Boston yesterday afternoon is the second successful terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11/01.  The first was at Fort Hood in 2009.  Our government can call it whatever they want but we know what it was.

This morning we know for sure that an 8-year-old boy is one of the three killed.  This is the only evidence we need to be certain that the person(s) who set the bombs is a cowardly animal.  There is no humanity present in such people.  The bombs were designed to indiscriminately cause pain and to maim and disfigure anyone in range.  What kind of hatred does that take?

The reported “facts” changed minute to minute yesterday afternoon.  Some reporters I heard tried to be responsible, but it was nearly impossible.  Some members of the old media just couldn’t control themselves.  CNN’s National Security Analyst, Peter Bergen, suggested we may be dealing with a “right wing extremist.”  On MSNBC, Chris Matthews’ remarks were similar and predictable.

“Normally, domestic terrorists, people tend to be on the far right…do they just hate America so much or its politics or its government that they just want to do the damage, they don’t care if they get public credit, if you will?”

What’s wrong with these people and why do their employers tolerate them?  What benefit do they provide to society?

There were reports from areas in the Middle East that people there were celebrating the event.  Our government continues to send our money to these people and makes every effort not to offend them with words.

The reports about cell phone service being turned off changed back and forth, over and over.  But the providers say they did not interrupt service.  So is our government capable of turning off our phone service?  That subject will most likely be dropped.

It didn’t take much searching to find the pictures that the TV news censored.  The injuries are horrific.  As many noted, these are the injuries common to our soldiers who have witnessed them or been victims.  Is it any wonder they come home with emotional scars?  How hard is it to witness the cruelty some humans are capable of on a regular basis?  What is it like to live each day where this is routine and not a major news story?  What is it like to wonder if you will be the next to lose a leg?  What’s it like to live this day after day, week after week?

When I heard there was a “person of interest” in the hospital and that he was being treated for burns, my first thought was, “I hope they are slow and stingy with the morphine.”

Does that make me evil?

On live TV we watched the selflessness of Americans rushing to help.  The scene was not secure and there had already been two explosions.  Yet hundreds of people, professional or not, did anything they could to save lives.

That’s what we’re about.  That’s who we are.  Those are the people who make America great.

The bad guys, involved in the bombing yesterday or not, are watching all this closely.  They are looking to see how we react and what plans we have in place.  They will use all this against us in the future.

We are all Bostonians today.  We are all Americans today.  We are the good guys.  We wear the white hats.  Don’t let anyone tell you any differently.

God bless those in pain today.

Live the life you have today.

Stop waiting for the one you wish you had.

-Kathy

Read Full Post »

Sandy Hook And Other Atrocities

The Newtown families are in Washington this week and have been in the news and on TV.  It’s hard to look at them.  The murders of their babies were senseless and horrific.  We all feel deep compassion for them.  As a society we agree we should strive to prevent such a thing from happening again.

I doubt you can find anyone who disagrees up to this point.  But it is at this point that we diverge.  There are differing opinions about what we can and should do.  And sadly, this is where the politics come into play.  These people are being used and their grief exploited.

President Obama brought them to Washington aboard Air Force One.  They have spent the week visiting members of Congress in private and public meetings, and of course, talking with reporters.  The family members are supporting gun control measures that Congress is considering and they are in town to encourage them to vote in favor of these measures.  President Obama will hand over his weekly address to one of the parents to make her case to the nation.

Politico describes the families as lobbyists.  I’m not sure I would go that far, but they certainly have had amazing access to lawmakers that most people never get.  And they have hired actual lobbyists who have accompanied them to Washington and “opened doors” for them.  They have organized a non-profit group called Sandy Hook Promise and applied for 501(c)(3) status.  Their website includes an open letter to Congress listing their demands.

I am not so much bothered that these folks are getting so much access and attention.  I wish more average people could get this level of attention from our president and our lawmakers.  But what about other victims who don’t get the same treatment?

The people who lived through Hurricane Sandy got a visit from President Obama.  He hugged some of them, made a lot of promises and went home.  He didn’t take any of them to Washington with him on Air Force One.  They didn’t get to meet senators and congressmen.

Have you seen pictures lately from those damaged areas?  A lot of it still looks like a war zone.  The president’s promise of cutting through the red tape and getting the job done hasn’t happened.  The thing is, after the photo-ops there isn’t anything these people can give him.  And they have pretty much been forgotten.

What about the victims and family members of the Fort Hood shooting?  No rides on Air Force One for them either.  Heck, they can’t even get our government to admit the killer was an Islamic terrorist.  That, sadly, is precisely the problem.  Having a jihadist on a US military base where all soldiers have been disarmed doesn’t play well for a president who claims Al Qaeda is on the run.

And what of the families whose loved ones were killed in Benghazi?  The administration continues to do all it can to prevent the truth of what happened there to reach the public.  There were no rides on Air Force One, no visits to congress, no radio addresses.  Our Secretary of State chastised us for asking questions.

“What difference does it make now?”

Can you imagine Hillary Clinton or a member of Congress, or anyone for that matter, standing up in front of the Sandy Hook families and asking, “What difference does it make now?”  Of course you can’t.

So what’s different about the Sandy Hook families?

President Obama’s trusted advisor explains:

Carpe diem.

More gun control laws and eventual confiscation is on the wish list of the progressives.  And what better way to make your case than with the mutilated, dead bodies of little children?  But every politician involved and every member of the media who feeds this is despicable.  Because it’s not about those dead bodies.  It’s about the politics.

If it were about mutilated, dead bodies of children, you would all know the name Kermit Gosnell.  But how many of you do? 

Gosnell is on trial in Philadelphia for murder in his abortion clinic which is being described as a house of horrors.  It is the most horrific story I’ve seen in a long time.  You can read about it here if you want to.  I won’t type it out.  I’ve seen enough.

But the politicians have ignored it.  The media has ignored it.  This is the section of the courtroom reserved for the press during the trial.:

Ho hum.

Why no interest in those little dead bodies?  Why no advocate groups on TV?  Why no politicians writing legislation?  Why no trip on Air Force One?

Because the animal on trial is an abortionist.  And abortion is an all-important issue for progressives.  A story like this one could give it a bad name.  Can’t have that.

But little dead bodies are fair game to push gun control.  They are the “right” little dead bodies.  It’s a nauseating game where the value of a human life is graded by political ideology.  And with the proper guidance, connections, access and exposure, the grieving parents of Sandy Hook can make a progressive politician’s dreams come true.

Think I’m wrong?

Attend one of their events and try asking one of them, “What difference does it make now?”

See what hell rains down on you.

-Kathy

Read Full Post »